Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02762
Original file (BC 2010 02762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02762 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry code (RE) 2Q (approved medical retirement or 
separation) be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air 
Force. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He would like to reenlist in the Air Force. 

 

The applicant submits no supporting documentation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 15 May 2007. He 
was referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) for 
Tietze’s syndrome and they recommended he be discharged with 
severance pay and a disability rating of 10 percent. 

 

On 6 November 2007, the Secretary of the Air Force directed the 
applicant be separated under the provisions of Title 10 USC 
1203. The applicant was discharged with an RE code of 2Q. He 
was credited with serving 6 months and 23 days on active duty. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA validated the applicant’s 
disability discharge processing. They confirmed RE code 2Q is 
correct per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air 
Force, based on his disability discharge. They also stated the 
applicants current medical status has no affect on his RE code. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the preponderance of 
evidence reflects no error or injustice occurred during the 
disability process. DPSD did note, however, there was an error 
with the date of discharge. The error was corrected and the 


Defense Finance Accounting System was notified to issue the 
applicant severance pay. 

 

The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 8 April 2011, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt 
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, other than the administrative correction made by 
AFPC/DPSD, we find no basis to favorably consider this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-02762 in Executive Session on 19 July 2011, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 


 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Jan 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 25 Jan 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Apr 11. 

 


 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00348

    Original file (BC-2011-00348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code JFL (Discharge – Disability, Severance Pay) and his reentry code (RE) 2Q (personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that qualifies him to reenter the service. The applicant’s complete letter is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01547

    Original file (BC-2011-01547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Dec 04, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for continued service and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 10 percent disability rating for asthma. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Aug 11, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02945

    Original file (BC-2010-02945.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 20 Aug 04, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found the applicant unfit for continued military service based on his diagnosis of delusional disorder and referred him to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). AFPC/DPSD recommends denial, indicating the preponderance of the evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time of separation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2007-00092

    Original file (BC-2007-00092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00092 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q, which denotes “personnel medically retired or discharged”, be changed to one which will allow him to reenlist in the military. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01244

    Original file (BC-2010-01244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00361

    Original file (BC-2008-00361.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Mar 08, for review and comment within 30 days. The Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit G. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02760

    Original file (BC 2010 02760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. On 29 September 2009, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from active service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00921

    Original file (BC-2010-00921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36- 3212, on 30 Jan 06, with a reason for separation of Disability – EPTS, and issued an RE code of 2Q. They note, on his AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, the applicant’s medical condition existed prior to service (EPTS), was not permanently aggravated through military service, and was incompatible with the rigors of military service. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04025

    Original file (BC-2010-04025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge and reentry code (RE) be changed to allow him to reenter the Armed Services as a commissioned officer. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00670

    Original file (BC-2011-00670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00670 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 2Q (approved medical retirement or separation) be changed to allow him to reenter the Armed Services. On 6 November 2006, the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from the service for physical disability...